Evaluation of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Teleconsultation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe which variables were collected by rheumatologists to monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during teleconsultation and identify which ones have more impact on clinician intervention. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric, routine care cross-sectional study including patients with RA seen in teleconsultation between March and September 2020. Available variables assessing disease status were collected in teleconsultation files. Clinician intervention was defined by treatment escalation and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients with RA were included (116 females, mean age of 58 [SD 16] yrs, mean disease duration of 14 [SD 11] yrs). The presence or absence of patient self-reported RA flares was mentioned in all medical files, followed by the presence and/or the number of tender joints (76%), the duration of morning stiffness (66%), the number of pain-related nocturnal awakenings (66%) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) value (54%). Teleconsultation led to a clinician intervention in 22/143 patients (15%), representing 51% of patients with self-reported flares (22/43 patients). Therapeutic escalation was necessary in 13 patients and/or face-to-face consultation or day hospitalization were organized for 10 patients. Multivariate analysis identified RA flares (odds ratio [OR] 15.6, 95% CI 3.37-68.28) and CRP values > 10 mg/L (OR 3.32, 95% CI % 1.12-13.27) as the variables independently associated with clinician intervention. CONCLUSION: Our study identified patient-reported RA flares and increased CRP values as 2 red flags in teleconsultation, independently associated with therapeutic modification and/or the need for a rapid face-to-face consultation. These indicators may help clinicians' decision making in teleconsultation.

Risk factors of impaired humoral response to COVID-19 vaccination in rituximab-treated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To identify which factors influence humoral response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in rituximab (RTX)-treated patients. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, usual care study including consecutive patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in maintenance therapy with RTX. All patients received a two-dose regimen COVID-19 vaccination. Serum IgG antibody levels against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike proteins were measured at the time of the new RTX infusion. RESULTS: From the recruited patients, 16/45 (36%) produced antibodies reaching the assay cut-off value of 15 AU/ml and 29/45 (64%) had a negative serology. Within RTX-treated patients, 25 (56%) had undetectable B cells. Negative serology was associated with undetectable B cells (24/25 vs 5/20, P < 0.001). Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies correlated with CD19 counts (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). The effect of RTX and MTX was additive in terms of seroconversion rates (23% vs 50% in patients receiving RTX in monotherapy, P = 0.12) and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels [3.80 (95% CI 3.80, 7.50) vs 75 (95% CI 3.8, 353) AU/ml in patients receiving RTX in monotherapy; P = 0.025]. Multivariate analyses including demographics, disease characteristics, gammaglobulin levels, RTX and other therapies used, CD19 counts, and the time between the last RTX infusion and vaccination identified detectable B cells as the only variable independently associated with seropositivity [odds ratio 35.2 (95% CI 3.59, 344.20)]. CONCLUSIONS: B cell depletion is the main independent contributing factor of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in RTX-treated patients. Monitoring CD19 may be of interest to identify the most appropriate period to perform vaccination.

The role of chest CT in deciphering interstitial lung involvement: systemic sclerosis versus COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the main CT features that may help in distinguishing a progression of interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to SSc from COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This multicentric study included 22 international readers grouped into a radiologist group (RADs) and a non-radiologist group (nRADs). A total of 99 patients, 52 with COVID-19 and 47 with SSc-ILD, were included in the study. RESULTS: Fibrosis inside focal ground-glass opacities (GGOs) in the upper lobes; fibrosis in the lower lobe GGOs; reticulations in lower lobes (especially if bilateral and symmetrical or associated with signs of fibrosis) were the CT features most frequently associated with SSc-ILD. The CT features most frequently associated with COVID- 19 pneumonia were: consolidation (CONS) in the lower lobes, CONS with peripheral (both central/peripheral or patchy distributions), anterior and posterior CONS and rounded-shaped GGOs in the lower lobes. After multivariate analysis, the presence of CONs in the lower lobes (P < 0.0001) and signs of fibrosis in GGOs in the lower lobes (P < 0.0001) remained independently associated with COVID-19 pneumonia and SSc-ILD, respectively. A predictive score was created that was positively associated with COVID-19 diagnosis (96.1% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity). CONCLUSION: CT diagnosis differentiating between COVID-19 pneumonia and SSc-ILD is possible through a combination of the proposed score and radiologic expertise. The presence of consolidation in the lower lobes may suggest COVID-19 pneumonia, while the presence of fibrosis inside GGOs may indicate SSc-ILD.

Systemic sclerosis and the COVID-19 pandemic: World Scleroderma Foundation preliminary advice for patient management.

Due to the frequent presence of interstitial lung disease and widespread use of immunosuppressive treatment, systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients may be considered at risk for a more severe disease course and higher mortality when they develop Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - Coronavirus - 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus infection. Therefore, with World Scleroderma Foundation endorsement, experts from different specialties including rheumatology, virology and clinical immunology gathered virtually to answer to the main practical clinical questions regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection coming from both patients and physicians. This preliminary advice is aligned with other national and international recommendations, adapted for SSc patients.